Every Little Thing You Need To Take In About 360 Degree Feedback Projects

Decisions, decisions! Our lives are full of them, from the minute and mundane, like what to wear, to the important, such as what 360 degree feedback projects to invest in.

Clearly, change is the name of the game for the individual receiving 360 degree feedbackand for the organization interested in having such change translated into improved organizational functioning. However, change, growth, and development can be difficult to accomplish and assess. For example, at the individual level, important changes may be under way, but they may not be readily visible to others. Or at the organizational level, many factors can influence organizational functioning besides the performance of any one player. Constructive Feedback helps an employee understand that there are specific areas that need development. Specific (detailed) feedback provides the employee with information they can use to improve their performance. When giving 360 degree feedback, you may see several areas your employee needs to work on. Overloading them with feedback could overwhelm them. Avoid confusion by focusing on improving one or two areas at a time. Analyzing metrics of your employee’s performance will help you decide which skill to work on first. Ideally, 360 degree reports for individual leaders should be fairly easy to understand. But in some circumstances, it may be helpful to have a trained coach walk the leader through the results. That may be especially true if the survey was only used for a small group of leaders, or was designed to address sensitive feedback about a leader’s behavior. Few people have ever previously received feedback about the accuracy of their judgments about others, except possibly from their spouse or significant other. Most of those who receive respondent feedback are delighted, and possibly relieved, when their judgment matches others. Respondent feedback is welcome for most people. The 360 degree feedbacksurvey has questions regarding work competencies, behaviour, productivity, team work, etc. This makes it important to set out the parameters beforehand itself. It is key to keep all the feedback confidential since it ensures fairness and guineuine feedback. Biases can be avoided when there is confidentiality.



A 360-degree review should never be deemed a replacement for regular 1-2-1 catch ups between the employee and the manager. Regular monthly or quarterly check-ins also offer a valuable opportunity for managers to provide continuous feedback and coaching. Managers and employees want pay and promotion decisions to be fair. Research across large sets of employee groups indicate that users perceive 360 degree feedbackto be more fair than single-rate processes. When these decisions occur in a culture where rewards are based on performance or contribution rather than on seniority or politics, they will be fair. Overreliance on technology can occur repeatedly as organizations install or outsource a process to collect and score surveys without creating the necessary support systems to help people understand the process and how to use the results. Failure to manage the mechanics will foil the 360 degree feedbackproject, but attention to this aspect alone is insufficient. Successful projects include both strong process and technology support. You need to clarify for others what the specific opportunity is facing them right now – this is translating the possibility into a next step that others can see is a real opportunity. Now translate this opportunity into a specific action that can be taken, whether this is by you or by someone else. Organisations should avoid fear based responses when coming to terms with 360 feedback software in the workplace.

The Specificity/anonymity Conundrum

Overcoming the potential downsides of 360 reviews is simple — as long as you have the right tools. The right 360 degree software simplifies the 360-degree review process by making it easy for stakeholders at all levels of the organization — including leadership, managers, peers, and direct reports — to deliver feedback in real time. They also adapt to fit your organization’s performance management model, streamlining the review process whether you deliver reviews on an annual, mid-year, quarterly, or ongoing basis. During 360-degree feedback, there is arguably a higher concentration on negative character traits. You should highlight any weak points; but keep an overall focus on strengths, as this is the best way to improve and develop skills. It’s pivotal to make use of the 360 degree feedbackdata in a reasonable timeframe – for the growth of the organisation and its workforce. Through direction and objectives, your staff can develop their own personal attributes, which will transform into business accomplishment. Knowing that a 360 degree instrument used for development is assessing qualities that are, in fact, developable can be seen as a type of validity. The kind of validity study that is important in this case is a study showing that scores on the instrument can be changed through development planning and effort on the part of the man ager. The ideal automated 360-degree feedback system should generate a graphical, visually striking report that conveys all the major facts, perceptions and actionable advice that an individual needs take away from the whole process. All of this without burdening the recipient with too much information. Analysis and decision making become easier when an understanding of 360 appraisal is woven into the organisational fabric.

The 360 degree feedbackprocess can provide recognition and rewards based on competencies, skills, job behaviors, customer service scores, or team results or contributions. Some organizations also use the process to support incentive processes: bonuses, team recognition and rewards, gainsharing, and other creative reward policies. For 360-degree feedback to be effective, we tend to believe that anonymity of the raters is crucial. Research shows that data gathered for developmental purposes are more accurate when raters believe that their ratings will not be used to hurt and punish the persons they are rating. The flip side of anonymity is that, for some raters, it can be an opportunity to pay back "old debts." In either case, it is a good practice to have managers who will receive the feedback select the raters whose judgment they trust. A multi-rater appraisal, such as the 360 degree review, is an excellent method to address a variety of competencies through an analytical lens, including measuring factors that are otherwise difficult to quantify, such as teamwork, leadership abilities and communication skills. In 360, we are deliberately breaking the norm with good intention (if we were not then there would be little value in it), yet norm-breaking is notoriously (and logically) uncomfortable and, should the pain get too great, it can be dismissed, dissed and outlawed. Feedback is essential to facilitating performance improvements. Feedback allows people to utilize their strengths to their advantage. Feedback informs employees which actions create problems for others and to know what changes may be needed. Evaluating 360 degree feedback system can uncover issues that may be affecting employee performance.

Rating Tendencies

A positive side effect of 360 degree reviews is that they can help teams work more productively and effectively – simply by nature of openly sharing feedback with one another. Research also finds that as teams continue to seek out feedback from one another, they increase trust with each other and are more likely to achieve performance goals. Happy, driven, challenged, and focussed individuals are more likely to be motivated and productive and thus form the very crux of an effective organization. Team building and skill determining exercises like the 360-degree feedback process take precious time and effort and are resources expended in the service of an organization and its employees’ goals and interests. No other information has more impact on an employee's career than information on his or her performance. Hence, the accuracy, fairness, and usefulness of performance measures are critical factors to employees. The 360 degree feedbackprocess, which employees often design and introduce, improves employee relations by providing valid measures without bias toward minorities and women. Once reviewees have received their 360 degree feedbackreports, they will have to determine what competencies or behaviors they want to improve over the next few months. The list of planned actions for the development of competencies can be recorded in the form of an individual development plan (IDP). Many organizations assume that increasing the assessment pool beyond one person will improve the accuracy of measurement. It does not. In fact, simplistic, informal approaches to multisource assessment are likely to multiply rather than reduce error. Errors enter from respondents' concerns about anonymity and factors such as friendship, competition bias, and collusion. Making sense of 360 degree feedback eventually allows for personal and organisational performance development.

360 degree feedback can identify when an employee is considering leaving, and allow managers to take steps to improve the situation. 360 degree feedback tends to improve employee performance and enables large companies to have more productive, engaged workforces. Using 360-degree feedback as part of the appraisal process represents naivete to issues of hierarchy, status, and retribution and violates the condition of psychological safety that is necessary for a person to receive dissonant information about the self. It is extremely stressful for individuals to receive information about themselves that is discrepant from their self-image. The greater the level of discrepancy, the greater the stress and the more likely the individual will be to defend against the information; and so the defense mechanisms of denial, projection, and so on may kick in. Just imagine getting feedback that “someone you know thinks you are not good at listening to them and you are disrespectful and sometimes unfair – you have not got access to who this is but it is someone you know”. Compare it with “one of the four direct reports that you wanted feedback from thinks you are not listening to them; they do not feel respected by you and think you are sometimes unfair”. You can start to consider where this is coming from, and what you might be doing to have generated this perspective. Much more empowering and useful. The speed at which 360 degree feedbackis being embraced by business is accelerating. The first published reference to 360 degree feedbackin professional literature, outside of advertisements, occurred in late 1993; now the phrase is commonly used by professionals and laypeople alike. Human resources professionals, managers, and employees all see it as a commonsense approach to efficient and effective evaluation. Participants in a 360 degree feedbacksession may take it all very personally and that might not allow them to see it in a mature way. They may be thinking and feeling that there is nothing they can do and feel quite helpless about this. This is not an empowering position for them to plan their actions. Here you can use a depersonalisation technique. Keeping up with the latest developments regarding what is 360 degree feedback is a pre-cursor to Increased employee motivation and building the link between performance and rewards.

A Change In Role From Performance Judge To Coach

Upward ratings are an important part of 360-degree feedback for managers. Typically, the evaluations from four to six subordinates are collected. By shifting the traditional roles of the rater and the ratee, a new set of dynamics takes place. From the supervisor perspective, receiving upward ratings is potentially threatening. This represents one of the areas in which 360-degree feedback contributes to a new way of thinking about performance evaluations. 360-degree feedback is a valuable addition to the overall practice of gathering feedback related to an employee’s performance and development. While manager-to-employee feedback is essential (and should be conducted as part of an ongoing process that includes real-time performance feedback), 360-degree feedback introduces additional information from peers which might otherwise be missed. The objective of the 360-degree feedback process differs from company to company however the main objective of a 360-degree performance review used to evaluate the performance of the employee in a holistic manner expert in this field often claim that a properly and effectively implemented 360-degree feedback process makes the employee more comfortable with the organization and lead to their overall development along with boosting their performance. Get supplementary particulars on the topic of 360 degree feedback projects on this Wikipedia entry.

Related Articles:

More Background Information About 360 degree review technologies
More Insight About 360 feedback initiatives
Supplementary Insight About 360 appraisal processes
Supplementary Information About 360-Degree evaluation software systems
More Background Information With Regard To 360 degree evaluation systems
Extra Findings About 360 degree assessment processes
More Information With Regard To 360 review performance dimensions

Back to the Home Page